Top
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Evolution Bias
References
EVIDENCE #9
The rock strata finds (layers of buried fossils) are better explained
by a universal flood than by evolution.
The Rock Strata is better explained by a universal flood than by
gradual normal death of organisms over millions of years recorded in the
rock as evolutionists assert. A large flood is necessary for the formation
of fossils in the first place. Fossils require quick and tremendous
pressure to be formed. Without this, a carcass not only could not form a
fossil over time but would be eaten by scavengers or destroyed by bacteria.
The circulating water of a flood (along with gravity) would cause
smaller organisms to naturally bury lower and more mobile organisms, with
ability to temporarily avoid the flood, would be buried close to the top
for this reason. Such things as fish, which are already low in the sea,
would also naturally be buried low. A universal flood has been well
documented historically as having occurred. Evolutionists have used fossils
in rock sediments to say that simpler organisms were at the bottom of the
sediment and more complex ones were at the top. They have ignored the great
inconsistencies in the finds for which a flood could account but not the
evolutionary process. In fact, in some strata, a tree can be seen
protruding through several layer which supposedly formed over millions of
years.
- The columns in the rock strata are actually made up from
different regions of
the world. The full rock strata is found nowhere in the world. It is made
up of columns superimposed from different regions all over the world. The
whole strata is 100 miles thick but there is no locality more than one mile
and even this locality is the Grand Canyon. ([18], p.35)
- The rock strata
consists of a plethora of contradictions and reversals. Often the strata
that is supposed to be old is found on top and vice versa. Often they are
horizontal with one another. ([18], p.35)
- "Although sometimes there may be
evidences of physical disturbance (leading to faulting and holding) in
these `upside down' areas, it is quite often true that they can only be
revealed by an `unnatural sequence of fossils,' which means that the
fossils are not found in the order presupposed by their evolutionary
relationship." ([19], p.54)
- Evolutionist Walter E. Lammerts reports, "The
actual percentage of area showing this progressive order from the simple to
the complex is surprisingly small. Indeed formations with very complex
forms of life are often found resting directly on the basic granites.
Furthermore, I have in my own files a list of over 500 cases that attest to
a reverse order, that is, simple forms of life resting on top of more
advanced types." ([19], p.54)
- "In order to account for these numerous
exceptions to the supposed universal order of evolutionary development as
revealed in the fossiliferous rocks, theory has to be piled on top of
theory. Thus, the missing ages indicated by a disconformity are explained
by a supposed regional uplift and period of erosion. An inverted order of
fossils is explained by a regional uplift followed by a horizontal thrust
fault followed by a period of erosion, and so forth. One is reminded of
Occam's Razor, the principle that cautions against any unnecessary
multiplication of hypotheses to explain a given set of phenomena." ([19], p.54)
- "...in various parts of the earth there are fossils of trees that
protrude through several layers which indicates that these layers were
deposited and formed almost simultaneously and not over millions of
years..." ([22], p.28)
- Rock strata is far better explained by a universal
flood rather than millions of years.
- "The usual order of deposition of
fossils (as noted before, there are many, many exceptions to this
usual order) would be such that the simpler fossils would be deposited near
the bottom, and the more complex fossils near the top of each local
geographic column. The hydrodynamic sorting action of moving water is quite
efficient, so that each stratum would tend to contain an assemblage of
fossils of similar shapes and sizes. Simple organisms, dwelling at the
lower elevations, would normally also be buried at the lower elevations.
More complex animals, larger and more mobile, and dwelling at higher
levels, would obviously tend to be buried, if caught by the sediments at
all, only at higher elevations. Very few birds, higher mammals, and
especially men, would be overtaken and buried, but would usually float on
the surface until consumed by scavengers or simply decomposed." ([18], p.40) For
this reason as well fossil fuels could not have been created as
evolutionists state they were; the animals would decompose before they would
be buried over years upon years.
- A catastrophe such as a universal flood
is necessary for fossils to form. "Fossils of animals, for example, are
formed when animals are buried quickly and under tremendous pressure so
that their bones or imprint are preserved in rock. If living things are not
buried quickly and under enormous pressure, they will not be fossilized. Most of the many
millions of fossils in the world are found in rock which has been
affected by water, and, therefore, the fossils of these animals were formed
as a result of the animals being buried suddenly and quickly under
tremendous water pressure." ([22], p.27)
- An evolutionist geologist wrote, "A
carcass after death is almost sure to be torn apart or devoured by
carnivores or other scavengers, and if it escapes these larger enemies,
bacteria insure the decay of all but the hard parts, and even they crumble
to dust after a few years if exposed to the weather. If buried under moist
sediment or standing water, however, weathering is prevented, decay is
greatly reduced, and scavengers cannot disturb the remains. For these
reasons burial soon after death is the most important condition favoring
preservation...Water-borne sediments are so much more widely distributed
than all other kinds, that they include the great majority of all fossils.
Flooded streams drown and bury their victims in the shifting channel sands
or in the mud of the valley floor." ([19], p.63)
- "For example, there would
naturally be a tendency for those sediments and organisms which occupied
the lowest elevations before the flood to be buried deepest by the flood.
Thus, simple marine organisms and marine sediments would tend to be buried
deepest, then fishes and more complex marine creatures, then reptiles and
amphibians, then mammals, and finally, man. Another factor controlling to
some extent the order of deposition of the sediments and the organisms
contained in them would be that of the relation between the specific
gravity and the hydrodynamic drag. Each particle of material, as well as
the remains of each animal, would tend to fall by gravity out of the
aqueous mixture in which it was being carried. This tendency would be
resisted by the hydrodynamic drag force of the water acting upward on it.
The latter depends on the state of turbulence of the water and also on the
shape of the object, being greatest for objects of complex shape and least
for objects of streamlined shape. Thus there would be a tendency for
organisms of high density and simple structure to settle out most rapidly
and, therefore, to be buried deepest. This factor of hydrodynamic
selectivity is often highly efficient and would tend to cause rather highly
sorted sediments and fossils, with organisms of similar size and shape
being buried together. A third factor which would have an important effect,
so far as living organisms were concerned, would be their relative
abilities to escape the onrushing flood waters by retreating to higher
ground. The simpler, less mobile, smaller creatures would thus be caught
and trapped first, whereas higher animals, and especially man, would often
be able to retreat to the very highest points of the region before being
inundated. This too would mean that most men and higher animals would never
be buried at all in sediments, but would float on the surface of the waters
until decomposed or destroyed by scavenger fish." ([22], p.73)
- The flood
would have to have been a universal one since local floods would not have
produced the pressure that would be needed. ([15], p.27)
- An event of a
universal flood is accounted for "...by hundreds of reflections of
this...great event handed down in the legends and historical records of
practically all nations and tribes in the earth." ([19], p.65)
Top
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Evolution Bias
References