What do Creation Scientists Believe?
Scientists who call themselves "creation scientists" are professionals,
typically with advanced degrees from major universities, who are generally
involved in the same types of work as the average scientist.
The difference is that creation scientists have a "world-view", or "model"
for their science which is based on the belief that an intelligent designer
("God") exists who created our universe and the natural things in it.
The creation events were one-time events and are not taking place today.
A large subset of creation scientists could be called "Biblical creationists",
who take the first eleven chapters of the Bible to be real history,
including the creation of all things in six 24-hour days,
the existence of Adam and Eve as the first man and woman,
the unnatural introduction of "death" into the perfect creation because
of the disobedience of Adam and Eve, and the occurence
of a world-wide flood (Noah's flood) which destroyed most life and greatly
affected the processes operating on the earth.
Most creation scientists believe that the earth is "young" (on the order
of ten thousand years), but this is a secondary issue.
Biblical creationists believe that the Bible and true science are
in full harmony with each other -
there is no need to "check your brain at the door" when entering a church.
A major goal of creation science is to point out the weakness of
evolutionary theory, because basically there are only two alternatives
for how we got here, and if naturalistic processes are incapable
of the task, then special creation must be the correct answer.
On the positive side, creation scientists are developing alternative
models and theories in many areas to help our understanding of how
the universe works.
It should be noted that much of day to day scientific activity is not
heavily influenced by either evolutionary or creation assumptions,
but much scientific energy has been wasted over the last century
in the search for evolutionary evidences and experimental proofs,
which have been unsuccessful so far and will continue to be.
How much further might we be in some areas of scientific understanding if
a model of special creation had been the working hypothesis?
Go to Creation Science home page